UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:
	Preliminary Proxy Statement
	Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14A-6(E)(2))
	Definitive Proxy Statement
	Definitive Additional Materials
	Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

DMC GLOBAL INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
	No fee required.
	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
	Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

MAY 11, 2022

8:30 a.m. Local Time

 

11800 Ridge Parkway,

Suite 300, Broomfield,
Colorado 80021

 

REVIEW YOUR PROXY STATEMENT AND VOTE IN ONE OF FOUR WAYS:
INTERNET Visit the website on your proxy card
BY TELEPHONE Call the telephone number on your proxy card
BY MAIL Sign, date and return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope
IN PERSON Attend the annual meeting in Broomfield, Colorado See page 5 for instructions on how to attend
Please refer to the enclosed proxy materials or the information forwarded by your bank, broker or other holder of record to see which voting methods are available to you.

 

ALL STOCKHOLDERS ARE CORDIALLY INVITED TO ATTEND THE MEETING IN PERSON. WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE MEETING, PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED TO YOU AND VOTE YOUR SHARES AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER TO ENSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE MEETING. EVEN IF YOU HAVE GIVEN YOUR PROXY, YOU MAY STILL VOTE IN PERSON IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING. PLEASE NOTE, HOWEVER, THAT IF YOUR SHARES ARE HELD OF RECORD BY A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE AND YOU WISH TO VOTE AT THE MEETING, YOU MUST OBTAIN FROM SUCH RECORD HOLDER A PROXY ISSUED IN YOUR NAME.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be Held on May 11, 2022.

Similar to last year, we will be using the “Notice and Access” method that allows companies to provide proxy materials to stockholders via the Internet. On or about March 31, 2022, we will mail to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials which contains specific instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request paper copies. We believe this process should provide a convenient way to access your proxy materials and vote. The Proxy Statement and our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 are available at www.investorvote.com/boom.

		By Order of the Board of Directors,
		MICHELLE H. SHEPSTON
March 31, 2022		Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

Table of Contents

This page intentionally left blank

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

AGENDA

VOTING MATTERS

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2021 Business Overview

DMC Global Inc.’s (“DMC”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) businesses navigated a second consecutive year of challenging market conditions during 2021. DynaEnergetics, DMC’s energy products business, benefitted from a rebound in well completion activity following the COVID-19-related collapse in energy demand during 2020. However, a weak pricing environment in North America’s unconventional oil and gas industry negatively impacted DynaEnergetics’ profitability. At NobelClad, DMC’s composite metals business, global supply chain disruptions slowed end-market activity and disrupted metal deliveries.

Despite these challenges, DMC’s businesses maintained their focus on safety, operational excellence, and product innovation. In addition, DMC took an important step in its growth strategy by expanding its family of innovative, asset light businesses. On December 23, 2021, DMC acquired a 60% controlling interest in Arcadia, a leading provider of architectural building products. The transaction doubled DMC’s annualized revenue to $500.5 million (pro forma at December 31, 2021), and more than tripled the size of DMC’s addressable market.

TSR Performance

Our total stockholder return (“TSR”) relative to the compensation peer group identified below was at the 29^th percentile over one year, at the 69^th percentile over three years and at the 100^th percentile over five years:

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN RELATIVE TO COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

2021 Financial/Strategic Achievements

DMC’s consolidated sales increased 14% to $260.1 million from $229.2 million in 2020. At DynaEnergetics, sales increased 20% to $175.4 million from $146.4 million in 2020. The improvement was due to the recovery in energy demand and a corresponding increase in North American well-completion activity, which led to higher unit sales of DynaEnergetics’ DS perforating systems. The recovery in North America was offset by weak demand in DynaEnergetics’ international markets, which have been slower to rebound from the pandemic. Sales at NobelClad increased 2% to $84.8 million from $82.8 million in 2020.

Full-year Adjusted EBITDA* attributable to DMC was $20.2 million versus $19.1 million in 2020. At DynaEnergetics, Adjusted EBITDA was $16.4 million versus $16.3 million in 2020; while NobelClad reported Adjusted EBITDA of $13.7 million versus $10.7 million in 2020.

*Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) financial measure used by management to measure operating performance and liquidity.

We define EBITDA as net income or loss plus or minus net interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA excludes from EBITDA stock-based compensation, restructuring and impairment charges and, when appropriate, other items that management does not utilize in assessing DMC’s operating performance. As a result, internal management reports used during monthly operating reviews feature Adjusted EBITDA and certain management incentive awards are based, in part, on the amount of Adjusted EBITDA achieved during the year.

Adjusted EBITDA for a relevant fiscal year is the same as reported in the Company’s Form 10-K for that period. For a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, refer to Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

During 2021, DynaEnergetics maintained its market share in North America, despite a highly competitive environment. DynaEnergetics continued to invest in new technologies, which is expected to result in new product innovations during 2022. DynaEnergetics also strengthened its organization with the addition of several key positions, and improved manufacturing efficiency and quality at its North American production facilities.

NobelClad continued to pursue new applications for its composite metal plates. In the third quarter, it introduced DetaPipe™, a high-performance clad-metal pipe product designed for use in corrosive, high-temperature and high-pressure industrial-processing environments. DetaPipe is the result of several years of research and development, and management believes the new product offering will address a broad range of industrial processing applications, including the production of monoethylene glycol, a key ingredient in polyester. By the end of 2021, NobelClad had surpassed 800 days without a lost-time accident, and also improved its manufacturing quality.

Arcadia Acquisition

The Arcadia acquisition is a milestone transaction for DMC and aligns with our strategy of building a diversified portfolio of asset-light, industry-leading businesses with differentiated products and services. The acquisition is expected to double DMC’s consolidated sales, strengthen our gross margins and provide diversification outside our more cyclical energy and industrial infrastructure markets.

Arcadia recorded unaudited sales of $240.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $49.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. On a pro forma (unaudited) basis, DMC’s consolidated sales for the year ended December 31, 2021, were $500.5 million, while pro forma gross margin was 28%.

Arcadia’s strong position in a $4.5 billion segment of the architectural products industry will also significantly expand DMC’s addressable market. We believe Arcadia has the capability to achieve significant growth within this large market. From 2010 through 2020, Arcadia increased its sales at a 13% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and increased Adjusted EBITDA at a 23% CAGR. DMC expects the acquisition will be accretive to sales and Adjusted EBITDA within the first year. DMC intends to acquire the remaining 40% interest in Arcadia through a put and call option exercisable beginning in December 2024.

The acquisition was made possible by our debt-free balance sheet and responsible capital raising leading up to the execution and closing of the transaction. In 2021, we raised net proceeds of approximately $25.3 million through our at-the-market (ATM) equity program at a weighted average price per share of $64.47. During the second quarter of 2021 we raised an additional approximately $123.5 million in net proceeds through a registered public offering at a market price of $45.00 per share. The proceeds of these offerings were used in part to fund the acquisition of Arcadia. The remaining purchase price was funded with proceeds from an amended and restated credit facility.

Immediately prior to the acquisition of Arcadia, DMC’s net cash (defined as total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities minus debt) was $170.6 million, as compared to net cash of $42.6 million at December 31, 2020. DMC was debt-free immediately prior to the acquisition. DMC’s debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio after the Arcadia acquisition at December 31, 2021 was 3.0, while its net-debt-to Adjusted EBITDA at the end of the year was 2.3.

2021 Compensation Decisions at A Glance

The following pay decisions were made in 2021:

	COMPENSATION ELEMENT		2021 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
	•   The Compensation Committee maintained salaries at 2020 levels, except for one executive receiving a 4.8% increase due to increase in responsibilities		•   Generally, maintain salaries at 2020 levels due to continuing impacts of COVID and other impacts on the oil and gas industry •   Changes to base salary consider level of responsibility and complexity of position, peer compensation levels, individual performance, market alignment and other factors
	•   No change in target award opportunities		•   Target awards set as a percentage of salary for each NEO •   Weightings and metrics: • 70% — Company Performance • 30% — Individual Performance •   No payout on a metric if performance is below threshold; award capped at 180% of target
	•   Compensation Committee maintained grants at levels approximating 2020 levels		•   Consists of time-based restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs) (one-half of target LTI value) and performance-based stock units (PSUs) (one-half of target LTI value) •   Restricted stock or RSUs vest ratably over 3-year period based on continued service •   PSUs vest at end of 3-year period based on metrics set at time of grant •   Actual awards can range from 0% to 200% of target award •   Metrics:  • Relative TSR • Adjusted EBITDA

Good Compensation Governance Practices

The Compensation Committee continually evaluates the Company’s compensation policies and practices to ensure that they are consistent with good governance principles. Below are highlights of our governance practices:

WHAT WE DO			WHAT WE DON’T DO
	Provide the majority of compensation in performance-based pay			No “single-trigger” change of control severance benefits
	Maintain robust stock ownership requirements			No hedging transactions or pledging of our common stock by directors, officers or employees
	Maintain a clawback policy			No evergreen provision in the equity incentive plan
	Use an independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee			No liberal share recycling
	Conduct annual compensation program risk assessment			No liberal definition of change of control
	Limit perquisites			No defined benefit plans for executive officers

2021 Say On Pay Results & Shareholder Engagement

The Board of Directors gives significant weight to the advisory vote on executive compensation (say on pay) vote, as well as feedback from our stockholders, and responds accordingly. At the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 99.6% of stockholders supported our executive compensation program. Following the vote and throughout 2021, the Board and senior management team continued their regular cadence of communications with stockholders, engaging in over 100 in person and virtual meetings with investors during 2021, and no significant compensation matters were raised as a concern by investors. However, the Compensation Committee recognizes the ever-evolving compensation and governance landscape and will continue to review its practices and solicit stakeholder feedback on these issues.

GENERAL

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of DMC Global Inc., a Delaware corporation, is soliciting proxies for use at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 11, 2022, at 8:30 a.m., local time (the “Annual Meeting”), or at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes described in this proxy statement and in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at 11800 Ridge Parkway, Suite 300, Broomfield, Colorado 80021. On or about March 31, 2022, we will mail to all stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that contains specific instructions on how to access Annual Meeting materials via the Internet, as well as instructions on how to request paper copies. Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “the Company,” “DMC,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to DMC Global Inc.

SOLICITATION

We will bear the entire cost of solicitation of proxies, including preparation, assembly, printing and mailing of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and any additional information furnished to stockholders. Copies of solicitation materials will be furnished to banks, brokerage houses, fiduciaries, and custodians holding in their names shares of our common stock beneficially owned by others to forward to such beneficial owners. We may reimburse persons representing beneficial owners of common stock for their costs of forwarding solicitation materials to such beneficial owners. Original solicitation of proxies via the Internet may be supplemented by mail, telephone, or personal solicitation by our directors, officers, or other regular employees. No additional compensation will be paid to directors, officers, or other regular employees for such services.

OUTSTANDING SHARES AND QUORUM

Only holders of record of common stock at the close of business on March 17, 2022, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. At the close of business on March 17, 2022, we had 19,457,482 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote. Each holder of record of common stock on such date will be entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting.

A majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. However, if a quorum is not represented at the Annual Meeting, the stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, present in person or represented by proxy, have the power to adjourn the Annual Meeting from time to time, without notice other than by announcement at the Annual Meeting, until a quorum is present or represented. At any such adjourned meeting at which a quorum is present or represented, any business may be transacted that might have been transacted at the originally scheduled meeting.

VOTING RIGHTS AND PROCEDURES

Votes cast by proxy or in person will be counted by one or more persons appointed by us to act as inspectors (the “Election Inspectors”) for the Annual Meeting. The Election Inspectors will treat shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions as shares that are present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Abstentions will not have any effect on proposals 1, 2 or 4, but will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” on proposal 3.

Broker non-votes occur when a broker holding stock on behalf of a beneficial owner (in which case the stock is commonly referred to as being held “in street name”) lacks authority to vote the shares on some matters. Brokers are permitted to vote on “routine” proposals when they have not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the stock but are not permitted to vote on non-routine matters in the absence of such instructions. Proposal 3 relating to the proposed increase in our authorized shares and Proposal 4 relating to the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022 are considered “routine,” and there will therefore be no broker non-votes for such proposals. However, brokers will not be allowed to vote without instruction on proposals 1 or 2. The Election Inspectors will treat broker non-votes as shares that are present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Broker non-votes will have no effect on proposals 1 or 2.

We urge you to give voting instructions to your broker on all proposals.

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present; however, pursuant to our Majority Voting Policy, any director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast (in person or by proxy) “FOR” such candidate is required to submit a letter of resignation to the Board. See “Majority Voting Policy” below. Proxies may not be voted for a greater number of persons than there are nominees.

The non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers is subject to the approval of the affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast with respect to Proposal 2.

The approval of the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase our authorized shares is subject to the approval of an affirmative vote of holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of DMC common stock.

The ratification of our selection of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm will be subject to the approval of an affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast with respect to Proposal 4.

If no direction is indicated on a proxy card, the shares will be voted FOR each of the proposals set forth in this proxy statement. The persons named in the proxies will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect to additional matters that are properly presented for action at the Annual Meeting.

APPRAISAL RIGHTS

No action is proposed at the Annual Meeting for which the laws of the state of Delaware or our Bylaws provide a right of our stockholders to dissent and obtain appraisal of or payment for such stockholder’s common stock.

REVOCABILITY OF PROXIES

Any person giving a proxy pursuant to this solicitation has the power to revoke it at any time prior to the Annual Meeting. It may be revoked by filing with our Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or it may be revoked by attending the meeting and voting in person. Attendance at the meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy.

VOTING YOUR SHARES

Stockholder of Record: If you are a stockholder of record, there are several ways for you to vote your shares, as follows:

Beneficial Owner: If you are a beneficial owner, you should have received voting instructions from your broker, bank or other nominee. Beneficial owners must follow the voting instructions provided by their nominee in order to direct such broker, bank or other nominee as to how to vote their shares. The availability of telephone and Internet voting depends on the voting process of such broker, bank or nominee. Beneficial owners must obtain a legal proxy from their broker, bank or nominee prior to the Annual Meeting in order to vote in person.

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS

Proposals of stockholders that are intended to be presented at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to be included in our proxy materials for the meeting must be received by us not later than December 2, 2022, in order to be included in the proxy statement and proxy relating to that annual meeting.

Notice of any stockholder proposal to be considered at our 2023 Annual Meeting but not included in our proxy materials, must be submitted in writing and received by us in the manner set forth in our Bylaws. In general, the Bylaws provide that such a notice must be delivered not later than 60 days and not earlier than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of this year’s annual meeting date.

CONTACT INFORMATION

If you have questions or need more information about the Annual Meeting, or if you wish to submit a question or question to be asked at the Annual Meeting, you may write to or call:

Corporate Secretary
DMC Global Inc.
11800 Ridge Parkway, Suite 300
Broomfield, CO 80021
(303) 665-5700
corpsecretary@dmcglobal.com

You are also invited to visit the Company website at www.dmcglobal.com. The Company’s website materials are not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

Notice to Investors Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including  statements regarding our addressable market following the Arcadia acquisition, expectations regarding Arcadia’s future growth capabilities and being accretive to sales and Adjusted EBITDA within the next year and DMC’s intent to acquire the remaining 40% ownership interest in Arcadia. Such statements are based on numerous assumptions regarding present and future business strategies, the markets in which we operate, anticipated costs and the ability to achieve goals. Forward-looking information and statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause actual results and performance to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information and statements, including but not limited to the risks detailed from time to time in our SEC reports, including the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. We do not undertake any obligation to release public revisions to any forward-looking statement, including, without limitation, to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this news release, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

There are eight nominees for election to the Board. Each director elected will hold office until the 2023 Annual Meeting, or until his or her successor is elected and qualified, or until such director’s earlier death, resignation, or removal.

Shares represented by executed proxies will be voted, if authority to do so is not withheld, for the election of the eight nominees named below. Each of the nominees has consented to be named as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected. In the event that any nominee should be unavailable for election as a result of an unexpected occurrence, such shares will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board may propose.

NOMINEES

The names of the nominees and certain information about them are set forth below. In addition, we have included information about each nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led our Board of Directors to conclude that the nominee should serve as a director of the Company, in light of our business and corporate strategy.

REQUISITE VOTE

Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the shares entitled to vote in the election at a meeting at which a quorum is present; however, pursuant to our Majority Voting Policy, any director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast (in person or by proxy) “FOR” such candidate is required to submit a letter of resignation to the Board. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast for purposes of this proposal and will have no legal effect on this proposal.

	THE BOARD RECOMMENDS VOTE “FOR” EACH NAMED NOMINEE

The following individuals serve as our executive officers. Each executive officer is appointed by the Board and serves at the pleasure of the Board, subject to the terms of applicable employment agreements or arrangements as described under “Employment Agreements.”

Kevin T. Longe. Information regarding Mr. Longe, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is provided under Proposal 1 of this proxy statement under the caption, “Nominees.”

Michael Kuta. Mr. Kuta joined the Company on March 31, 2014 as our Chief Financial Officer. From 2007 until joining the Company, Mr. Kuta served in various executive positions with The Lubrizol Corporation, most recently from September 2011 until March 2014 as its corporate controller. From September 2009 until assuming that position, he was the finance manager of Lubrizol’s TempRite Engineered Polymers Business Unit, and before that served Lubrizol as a manager, treasury and capital markets and manager, external financial reporting. Before joining Lubrizol, Mr. Kuta also served in various financial and accounting positions with Lincoln Electric Company and Eaton Corporation. Mr. Kuta received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Kent State University and an M.B.A. from Case Western Reserve University.

Michelle Shepston. Ms. Shepston serves as our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, having previously served as Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary from her appointment in August 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Shepston was with Denver-based Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, a leading regional law firm where she was a partner and practiced with the Corporate Finance and Acquisitions Group. Ms. Shepston brings to the Company expertise in corporate and securities law, mergers and acquisitions, equity and debt transactions, compliance, and corporate governance. She has advised public and private company boards on issues of fiduciary duty, risk management and oversight. She earned a J.D. from the University of Denver College of Law and a B.S. from the University of Illinois.

Ian Grieves. Mr. Grieves serves as President and Managing Director of DynaEnergetics, having previously served as Senior Vice President and General Manager of DynaEnergetics from his appointment in January 2013. From 2006 until joining the Company, Mr. Grieves was employed by Lydall Inc. as senior vice president of the company’s performance materials division (2010-2013), and as vice president and general manager Europe of the company’s filtration division (2006-2010). From 1995 to 2005, he was employed in various financial and general management positions with AAF International Inc., with his last position being that of vice president and general manager of AAF Europe (2003-2005). Mr. Grieves studied economics and graduated from the University of Sunderland, United Kingdom.

Antoine Nobili. Mr. Nobili was named president of NobelClad in July 2020. Previously, he spent 11 years as managing director of NobelClad’s European operations. He joined the business in 1995 as a research and development engineer. In 2000, he was promoted to product manager, and led the commercialization of NobelClad’s explosion-welded electrical transition joints (ETJs), which today are used extensively by the global aluminum smelting industry. He was named general manager of operations of NobelClad’s manufacturing facility in Rivesaltes, France in 2003. In  2009, he became managing director of the EMEA region (Europe, Middle-East and Africa), including NobelClad’s manufacturing operations in Germany. Mr. Nobili holds a Master of Business Administration from IFG – the French Institute for Business and Administration and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from the National School of Engineers of Tarbes.

James H. Schladen. Mr. Schladen serves as President of Arcadia, a position that he has held since 2000. Mr. Schladen started at the company in 1986 and subsequently left to co-found Wilson Partitions, a building products business focused on commercial interior products. Wilson Partitions was acquired by Arcadia in 1998, at which time Mr. Schladen rejoined the company and worked in various roles, including Head of Sales for Arcadia Commercial Exteriors and as President of Commercial Interiors, until he was appointed President in 2000. Mr. Schladen has a BS in Business Economics from the University of California, Los Angeles.

MEETING ATTENDANCE

Directors are encouraged to attend our Annual Meeting of Stockholders. All of our directors then in office attended the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, the Board held 16 meetings. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, each of our directors attended more than 75% of the aggregate of (i) the number of meetings of the Board held during the period in which he or she was a director and (ii) the number of meetings of the committees on which he or she served.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The Board has determined that seven of the eight current directors, Messrs. Aldous, Cohen, Graff, Kelly and Rose and Mses. Bertone and Dreessen, are “independent” directors under the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the applicable rules of the Nasdaq. In making its determinations of independence, the Board considered factors for each director such as other directorships, employment or consulting arrangements, and any relationships with our customers or suppliers. The Board also considered a review of any transactions with entities associated with our directors or members of their immediate family.

The Board determined that there were no related-party transactions or other relationships that needed to be considered in evaluating whether these directors are independent. Mr. Longe, our President and Chief Executive Officer, is the only Board member nominated for re-election who is not independent based on these criteria.

All current members of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are independent directors. Our independent directors hold regularly scheduled meetings in executive session, at which only independent directors are present.

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

The Board does not have a prescribed policy on whether the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer positions should be separate or combined. The Company currently separates the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Our Chief Executive Officer is responsible for setting the strategic direction for the Company and the day to day leadership and performance of the Company, while our Chairman of the Board oversees the Board, approves Board agendas and schedules, facilitates communication between the Chief Executive Officer and the rest of the Board and provides guidance to the Chief Executive Officer. We believe our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman have an excellent working relationship that allows the Chief Executive Officer to focus the requisite time and energy on the Company’s businesses, people and growth opportunities.

Our Board currently has seven independent members and only one non-independent member, the Chief Executive Officer. A number of our independent Board members are currently serving or have served as senior management of other public companies and are currently serving or have served as directors of other public companies. We believe that the number of experienced, independent directors, along with the independent oversight of the Board by our non-executive Chairman, benefits the Company and our stockholders.

The Board assesses our Board leadership structure from time to time and makes changes when appropriate. We recognize that different board leadership structures are appropriate for companies in different situations. We believe our current leadership structure is the optimal structure for the Company at this time.

BOARD COMPOSITION

In accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5605(f), Nasdaq-listed companies (subject to certain exceptions) must have at least (i) one director who self-identifies as female and (ii) one director who self-identifies as Black or African American, Hispanic of Latinx, Native American or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, two or more ethnicities, or as LGBTQ+. In the event a Nasdaq-listed company does not meet the above criteria, it must disclose why. Further, in accordance with Nasdaq Rule 5606, Nasdaq-listed companies, subject to certain exceptions, must disclose this statistical information in a uniform matrix format.

The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our Board members as of December 31, 2021. Each of the categories listed in the table below has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).

BOARD COMMITTEES

The Board currently has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and a Risk Committee. Each committee operates under a written charter, which sets forth the functions and responsibilities of the committee. A copy of the charter of each committee can be viewed on our website, www.dmcglobal.com.

MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

	Audit Committee		Compensation Committee		Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee		Risk Committee
INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
David C. Aldous*
Andrea E. Bertone
Robert A. Cohen
Ruth I. Dreessen
Richard P. Graff
Michael A. Kelly
Clifton Peter Rose
NON-INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS
Kevin T. Longe

 Member  Chair * Non-Executive Chairman

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee meets with our independent registered public accounting firm at least four times a year to review quarterly financial results and the annual audit, discuss financial statements and related disclosures, and receive and consider the accountants’ comments as to internal control over financial reporting, adequacy of staff and management performance and procedures in connection with the annual audit and internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee also appoints the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee currently consists of four directors, each of whom is a non-employee director that the Board has determined to be “independent” as that concept is defined in Section 10A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder, and the applicable rules of the Nasdaq. The Audit Committee has determined that Mr. Graff qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under the rules of the SEC.

The Charter of the Audit Committee requires the Audit Committee be comprised of three or more independent directors, at least one of whom qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in Item 407(d)(5) of SEC Regulation S-K. The Charter of the Audit Committee charges the Audit Committee with the primary responsibility of reviewing the Company’s compliance with the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct (“Code of Ethics”) as it relates to financial statement and reporting issues and related party transactions that would be required to be disclosed pursuant to Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

During 2021 the Audit Committee met nine times.

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee makes recommendations concerning salaries, incentive compensation and equity-based awards to employees and non-employee directors under our stock incentive plan and otherwise determines compensation levels and performs such other functions regarding compensation as the Board may delegate. The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in the Company’s proxy statement.

The Compensation Committee has authority to retain such compensation consultants, outside counsel and other advisors as the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion deems appropriate. The Compensation Committee is currently composed of four directors, each of whom is a non-employee director that the Board has determined to be “independent” under SEC and Nasdaq rules.

During 2021 the Compensation Committee met four times.

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recommends director nominees and sets corporate governance policies for the Board and Company. The Corporate Governance  and Nominating Committee currently has three directors, each of whom is a non-employee director that the Board has determined to be “independent” under the SEC and Nasdaq rules. The main purposes of this Committee are (i) to identify and recommend individuals to the Board for nomination as members of the Board and its committees; (ii) to develop and recommend to the Board corporate governance principles applicable to the Company; (iii) to oversee the Board’s annual evaluation of its performance; (iv) in coordination with the Audit Committee, review compliance with the Company’s Code of Ethics; and (v) to undertake such other duties as the Board may from time to time delegate to the Committee.

During 2021, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee met four times.

The Risk Committee

The Risk Committee (“Risk Committee”) is responsible for broad oversight of risk, with the primary purpose of assisting the Board with its oversight of the Company’s level of risk, risk assessment and risk management in areas not otherwise addressed by other committees of the Board. This includes review of the health, safety, environmental and sustainability practices and policies of the Company and controls around cybersecurity and cyber incident responses.

The Risk Committee is currently comprised of three non-employee directors whom the Board has determined are “independent” under SEC and Nasdaq rules, and our CEO.

The Risk Committee met four times during 2021.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

We do not have any interlocking relationships between any director who currently serves or served during 2021 as a member of our Compensation Committee and any of our executive officers that would require disclosure under the applicable rules promulgated under the U.S. federal securities laws.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

DMC is committed to sound principles of corporate governance. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines prepared by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Among other things, the guidelines provide that directors should serve no longer than a total of 15 years as a non-employee director or after the director’s 75^th birthday. Due to the unique circumstances of the Arcadia acquisition and the significant financial and internal control integration efforts that will occur in the coming year, the Board has elected to waive the age limit for Mr. Graff. He is expected to continue as a director and the Chair of the Audit Committee until the 2023 annual meeting.

Our Board periodically, and at least annually, reviews and revises the Corporate Governance Guidelines, as appropriate, to ensure that they reflect our Board’s corporate governance objectives and commitments. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the Company’s website at www.dmcglobal.com.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

We have stock ownership guidelines applicable to our directors and named executive officers. For a description of these guidelines, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis- Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

PLEDGING AND HEDGING POLICIES

Our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from using any strategies or products (such as derivative securities or short-selling techniques) to hedge against potential changes in the value of DMC common stock. In addition, our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from holding DMC securities in a margin account or pledging DMC securities as collateral for a loan.

CODE OF ETHICS AND BUSINESS CONDUCT

We have adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all members of our Board and all of our employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer and all other senior members of our finance and accounting departments. We require all employees to adhere to our Code of Ethics in addressing legal and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. Our Board periodically, and at least annually, reviews and revises our Code of Ethics, as appropriate. A copy of our Code of Ethics is available on our website, www.dmcglobal.com.

RISK OVERSIGHT

Our senior management manages the risks facing the Company under the oversight and supervision of the Board. The Company has a global Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) team, which is comprised of senior management in key business areas. The ERM team employs a proactive approach to reviewing and analyzing current and potential risks facing the Company, and reports to the Board regarding the ERM process and risk findings on a quarterly basis. While the full Board is ultimately responsible for risk oversight at our Company, our Board committees assist the Board in fulfilling its oversight function in certain areas of risk. The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to risk in the areas of financial reporting processes and internal controls around those processes (including cybersecurity related thereto), the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and the financial risks of the Company. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee oversees governance matters, including primary oversight of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The Compensation Committee oversees the Company’s executive compensation strategy and programs, incentive compensation arrangements and the evaluation of risks related thereto. The Risk Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities with respect to the management of the Company’s level of risk, risk assessment and risk management in areas not otherwise addressed by other committees of the Board. Other general business risks such as economic and regulatory risks are monitored by the full Board.

COMPENSATION RISK ASSESSMENT

Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of management, reviews on an annual basis our compensation programs and considers whether they encourage excessive risk-taking by employees at the expense of long-term Company value. The Compensation Committee believes that the design of our compensation program, which includes a mix of annual and long-term incentives (a substantial portion of which are performance based) and cash and equity awards, along with our stock ownership guidelines and clawback policy, provide an appropriate balance between risk and reward and do not motivate imprudent risk-taking. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation policies are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

DIRECTOR NOMINATIONS

The Company does not have a formal policy regarding the consideration of director candidates recommended by stockholders; however, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews recommendations and evaluates nominations received from stockholders in the same manner that potential nominees recommended by Board members, management or other parties are evaluated. Any stockholder nominations proposed for Board consideration should include the nominee’s name and qualifications for Board membership and should be mailed to DMC Global Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 11800 Ridge Parkway, Suite 300, Broomfield, Colorado 80021.

Qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular area of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing Board composition. However, in making its nominations, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers, among other things, an individual’s skills, attributes and functional, business and industry experience, financial background, breadth of knowledge about issues affecting our business, integrity, independence, diversity of experience, leadership, ability to exercise sound and ethical business judgment and time available for meetings and consultation.

Diversity along multiple dimensions is an important element of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee’s consideration of nominees. While diversity is evaluated in a broad sense based on experience, background and viewpoint, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee recognizes that DMC serves diverse communities and customers and believes that the composition of our Board should appropriately reflect this diversity. Accordingly, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee also considers other aspects of diversity, including gender, race and ethnicity. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is committed to seeking highly qualified women and individuals from minority groups to include in the pool of nominees and instructs any third-party search firm to consider these elements accordingly.

For new nominees, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee may also consider the results of the nominee’s interviews with directors and/or other members of senior management as the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee deems appropriate.

MAJORITY VOTING POLICY

The Board has adopted a majority voting policy (“the Majority Voting Policy”) as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines. The policy stipulates that, at any stockholder meeting at which directors are subject to an uncontested election, if the number of shares “withheld” for any nominee exceeds the number of shares voted “FOR” such nominee, then, notwithstanding that such director was duly elected as a matter of corporate law, he or she shall submit to the Board a letter of resignation for consideration by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee will consider such offer of resignation and will make a recommendation to the Board concerning the acceptance or rejection of the offer of resignation. In the event that all members of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee are among the nominees for director who are offering to resign, the Board shall appoint a special committee of one or more other independent directors to act on behalf of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee with respect to this policy. The Board shall act promptly with respect to each such letter of resignation and shall promptly notify the director concerned of its decision.

COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD

The Board believes that it is important for stockholders to have a process to send communications to the Board. Accordingly, stockholders desiring to send a communication to the Board, or to a specific director, may do so by delivering a letter to our Secretary at DMC Global Inc., c/o Corporate Secretary, 11800 Ridge Parkway, Suite 300, Broomfield, Colorado 80021. The mailing envelope must contain a clear notation indicating that the enclosed letter is a “Stockholder-Board Communication” or “Stockholder-Director Communication.” All such letters must identify the author as a stockholder and clearly state whether the intended recipients of the letter are all members of the Board or specified individual directors. The Secretary will open such communications and make copies and then circulate them to the appropriate director or directors.

ANNUAL BOARD ASSESSMENTS

In order to monitor and improve its effectiveness, and to solicit and act upon feedback received, the Board engages in a formal self-evaluation process. The Board believes that in addition to serving as a tool to evaluate and improve performance, evaluations can serve several other purposes, including the promotion of good governance, integrity of financial reporting, reduction of risk, strengthening of the Board-management partnership, and helping set and oversee Board expectations of management. The Board takes a multi-year perspective to identify and evaluate trends and assure itself that areas identified for improvement are appropriately and timely addressed. As part of the Board’s evaluation process, directors consider various topics related to Board composition, structure, effectiveness and responsibilities and the overall mix of director skills, attributes, experience and backgrounds. While the Board conducts a formal evaluation annually, the Board considers its performance and that of its committees continuously throughout the year and shares feedback with management.

The Company continued its focus on safety, operational excellence, innovation and strengthening our financial position and completed a significant acquisition, while continuing to navigate challenging market conditions in 2021. We believe our executive compensation program has played a critical role in retaining the key members of our management team and motivating them to focus on the creation of long-term stockholder value during another year of significant challenges.

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act and SEC Rule 14a-2(a), we are providing our stockholders the opportunity to vote on a non-binding advisory resolution to approve the compensation of our named executive officers (“Say on Pay”) which is described in this Proxy Statement. Currently, we are providing these advisory votes on an annual basis. In considering your vote on this proposal, we encourage you to review all of the relevant information in this proxy statement, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and the rest of the narrative disclosures regarding our compensation arrangements.

Following the 2022 Annual Meeting, the next advisory Say-on-Pay vote is anticipated to be held at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Our Board strongly endorses the Company’s executive compensation program and recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the following advisory resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and narrative discussion in the Company’s proxy statement is hereby APPROVED.”

REQUISITE VOTE

The advisory vote on the compensation of our named executive officers will be approved by the majority of votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on the proposal. Our Board and our Compensation Committee value the opinions of our stockholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when considering future decisions on the compensation of our named executive officers. However, this say-on-pay vote is advisory, and therefore not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee or our Board.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 2.

On March 2, 2022, the Board, determining it to be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, authorized, subject to approval and adoption by the stockholders, an amendment (the “Authorized Shares Amendment”) to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended by the Authorized Shares Amendment, the “Post-Authorized Shares Certificate”) to increase the number of authorized shares of our common stock from 25 million to 50 million. The full text of the Authorized Shares Amendment is attached to this proxy statement as Appendix A.

As of March 17, 2022, a total of 19,504,055 of the Company’s currently authorized 25 million shares of DMC common stock were outstanding and 2,890,480 shares were reserved for issuance under our employee benefit plans, leaving only 2,605,465 shares available for issuance. The increase in the number of authorized but unissued shares of our common stock would enable the Company, without further stockholder approval (other than as required by applicable Nasdaq rules), to issue shares from time to time as may be required for business purposes such as raising additional capital for ongoing operations, business and asset acquisitions, present and future employee benefit programs and other corporate purposes. In addition, under the operating agreement for Arcadia, we have the right to acquire the remaining 40% ownership interest in Arcadia beginning in December 2024. We may also be required to purchase some or all of the remaining interests by the minority holder at any time after December 2024, and may elect to pay the purchase price for such interests through the issuance of newly created series A preferred stock, which would be convertible into common stock. In order to allow flexibility to purchase and finance the remaining ownership interest in Arcadia in either cash or preferred stock, it is critical to have sufficient authorized common stock.

The proposed Authorized Shares Amendment would not change the terms of our common stock, and the additional shares of DMC common stock to be authorized pursuant to the Authorized Shares Amendment would have rights identical to the currently outstanding shares of DMC common stock. The Board has not proposed an increase in the number of authorized shares of our common stock with the intention of discouraging tender offers or takeover attempts relating to the Company. However, the availability of additional authorized shares for issuance may have the effect of discouraging a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or other attempt to obtain control of the Company.

The Board recognizes that the issuance of additional shares of our common stock may adversely affect the interests of the holders of DMC Global common stock. For example, in the absence of a proportionate increase in the Company’s earnings and book value, an increase in the aggregate number of outstanding shares caused by the issuance of additional shares would dilute the earnings per share and book value per share of all of the existing outstanding shares of our common stock. However, the Board believes that these potential risks are outweighed by the benefit that an increase in the number of available shares would provide in terms of additional financing flexibility. The Board believes that retaining the ability to act quickly on future opportunities that may require or be facilitated by additional stock issuances and the ability to finance the purchase of the remainder of Arcadia will benefit existing stockholders.

EFFECTIVE TIME

The effective time of the Authorized Shares Amendment, if approved by the stockholders and not otherwise abandoned by the Board, will be the time that the Certificate of Amendment setting forth the Authorized Shares Amendment is filed with the Delaware Secretary of State. The exact timing of the filing of the Certificate of Amendment setting forth the Authorized Shares Amendment will be determined by our Board based on its evaluation as to when such action will be the most advantageous to the Company and its stockholders.

If, at any time prior to the filing of the Certificate of Amendment setting forth the Authorized Shares Amendment with the Delaware Secretary of State, notwithstanding stockholder approval and without further action by the stockholders, the Board, in its sole discretion, determines that it is in the Company’s best interests and the best interests of our stockholders to abandon the Authorized Shares Amendment, the Authorized Shares Amendment may be abandoned.

PROPOSED RESOLUTION

In light of the foregoing, the Board recommends that you vote in favor of the following resolution at the Meeting:

RESOLVED, that the amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of DMC Global Inc. to increase the number of authorized shares of DMC Global common stock from 25 million to 50 million is hereby approved and adopted.

REQUISITE VOTE

Approval of the Authorized Shares Proposal will require the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority in voting power of the outstanding shares of DMC Global common stock.

If you fail to vote or submit a proxy or fail to instruct your broker to vote (and your broker does not exercise its discretion to vote your shares on this matter) or vote to “abstain,” it will have the same effect as a vote “AGAINST” the Authorized Shares Proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 3.

The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”) as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2022. EY has been so engaged since 2002.

The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm retained to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In accordance with its commitment to sound corporate governance practices, the Audit Committee reviews whether it is in the Company’s best interests to rotate the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. In fulfilling its oversight responsibility, the Audit Committee carefully reviews the policies and procedures for the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, including the scope of the audit, audit fees, auditor independence matters, performance of the independent auditors and the extent to which the independent registered public accounting firm may be retained to perform non-audit services. The Audit Committee and its Chair are also directly involved with the selection, review and evaluation of the lead engagement partner and the negotiation of audit fees. The Audit Committee reviews the performance of the independent registered public accounting firm annually. In conducting its review, the Audit Committee considers, among other things:

Ratification of the selection of EY by stockholders is not required by law. However, as a matter of internal policy and good corporate governance, such selection is being submitted to the stockholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting, and it is the present intention of the Board to continue this policy. If the stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether to retain EY. If the selection of EY is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time it decides that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.

We expect that a representative of EY will be present at the Annual Meeting and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Company paid the following fees to EY for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and for other services provided in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

AUDITOR FEES

AUDIT COMMITTEE PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

In accordance with the SEC’s rules requiring the Audit Committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by our independent auditor, the Audit Committee has adopted a formal policy on auditor independence requiring the approval by the Audit Committee of all professional services rendered by our independent auditor prior to the commencement of the specified services. The Audit Committee approved all services performed by EY in 2021 in accordance with our formal policy on auditor independence.

REQUISITE VOTE

The selection of our auditors will be ratified by the majority of votes cast on this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes cast on the proposal.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF PROPOSAL 4.

As of December 31, 2021, the Audit Committee of DMC Global Inc. (the “Company”) was comprised of Messrs. Richard P. Graff (Chairman) and David C. Aldous and Mses. Andrea E. Bertone and Ruth I. Dreessen, each of whom the Board of Directors of the Company has determined to be independent as that concept is defined in Section 10A of the Exchange Act, the rules promulgated by the SEC thereunder and the applicable rules of the Nasdaq. The Audit Committee has adopted a Charter that describes its responsibilities in detail. The Charter is available on the Company’s website at www.dmcglobal.com.

The primary responsibility for financial and other reporting, internal controls, compliance with laws and regulations, and ethics rests with the management of the Company. The Audit Committee’s primary purpose is to oversee the integrity of the accounting and financial reporting process, the audits of the Company’s financial statements and the processes designed to ensure that the financial statements adequately represent the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. These responsibilities include oversight of (i) the integrity of the Company’s financial statements; (ii) the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; (iii) the external auditors’ qualifications and independence; and (iv) the performance of the Company’s internal and external audit functions. The Committee is also responsible for understanding the Company’s internal control structure and areas that represent high risk for material misstatement of the financial statements. Additional information regarding the Audit Committee’s role in corporate governance can be found in the Audit Committee’s Charter.

As required by the Charter of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the Company’s audited financial statements with the Company’s management. The Audit Committee has also discussed with Ernst & Young LLP (“EY”), the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by the Auditing Standard No. 1301, Communications with Audit Committees, issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee has received from EY the written disclosures and the letter required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with EY that firm’s independence. Based upon these discussions and the Audit Committee’s review, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company include the audited financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Audit Committee Members:

Richard P. Graff, Chairman

David C. Aldous

Andrea E. Bertone

Ruth I. Dreessen

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)

Our CD&A details the objectives and elements of the DMC Global executive compensation program, describes the related processes of our Compensation Committee, and discusses the compensation earned by our Named Executive Officers (NEOs). For 2021, our NEOs were:

Executive Summary

2021 Business Overview

DMC Global Inc.’s (“DMC”, “we”, “us”, “our”, or the “Company”) businesses navigated a second consecutive year of challenging market conditions during 2021. DynaEnergetics, DMC’s energy products business, benefitted from a rebound in well completion activity following the COVID-19-related collapse in energy demand during 2020. However, a weak pricing environment in North America’s unconventional oil and gas industry negatively impacted DynaEnergetics’ profitability. At NobelClad, DMC’s composite metals business, global supply chain disruptions slowed end-market activity and disrupted metal deliveries.

Despite these challenges, DMC’s businesses maintained their focus on safety, operational excellence, and product innovation. In addition, DMC took an important step in its growth strategy by expanding its family of innovative, asset light businesses. On December 23, 2021, DMC acquired a 60% controlling interest in Arcadia, a leading provider of architectural building products. The transaction doubled DMC’s annualized revenue to $500.5 million (pro forma at December 31, 2021) , and more than tripled the size of DMC’s addressable market.

TSR Performance

Our total stockholder return (“TSR”) relative to the compensation peer group identified below was at the 29^th percentile over one year, at the 69^th percentile over three years and at the 100^th percentile over five years:

TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURN RELATIVE TO COMPENSATION PEER GROUP

2021 Financial/Strategic Achievements

DMC’s consolidated sales increased 14% to $260.1 million from $229.2 million in 2020. At DynaEnergetics, sales increased 20% to $175.4 million from $146.4 million in 2020. The improvement was due to the recovery in energy demand and a corresponding increase in North American well-completion activity, which led to higher unit sales of DynaEnergetics’ DS perforating systems. The recovery in North America was offset by weak demand in DynaEnergetics’ international markets, which have been slower to rebound from the pandemic. Sales at NobelClad increased 2% to $84.8 million from $82.8 million in 2020.

Full-year Adjusted EBITDA* attributable to DMC was $20.2 million versus $19.1 million in 2020. At DynaEnergetics, Adjusted EBITDA was $16.4 million versus $16.3 million in 2020; while NobelClad reported Adjusted EBITDA of $13.7 million versus $10.7 million in 2020.

During 2021, DynaEnergetics maintained its market share in North America, despite a highly competitive environment. DynaEnergetics continued to invest in new technologies, which is expected to result in new product innovations during 2022. DynaEnergetics also strengthened its organization with the addition of several key positions, and improved manufacturing efficiency and quality at its North American production facilities.

NobelClad continued to pursue new applications for its composite metal plates. In the third quarter, it introduced DetaPipe™, a high-performance clad-metal pipe product designed for use in corrosive, high-temperature and high-pressure industrial-processing environments. DetaPipe is the result of several years of research and development, and management believes the new product offering will address a broad range of industrial processing applications, including the production of monoethylene glycol, a key ingredient in polyester. By the end of 2021, NobelClad had surpassed 800 days without a lost-time accident, and also improved its manufacturing quality.

Arcadia Acquisition

The Arcadia acquisition is a milestone transaction for DMC and aligns with our strategy of building a diversified portfolio of asset-light, industry-leading businesses with differentiated products and services. The acquisition is expected to double DMC’s consolidated sales, strengthen our gross margins and provide diversification outside our more cyclical energy and industrial infrastructure markets.

Arcadia recorded unaudited sales of $240.3 million and Adjusted EBITDA of $49.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. On a pro forma (unaudited) basis, DMC’s consolidated sales for the year ended December 31, 2021, were $500.5 million, while pro forma gross margin was 28%.

Arcadia’s strong position in a $4.5 billion segment of the architectural products industry will also significantly expand DMC’s addressable market. We believe Arcadia has the capability to achieve significant growth within this large market. From 2010 through 2020, Arcadia increased its sales at a 13% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and increased Adjusted EBITDA at a 23% CAGR. DMC expects the acquisition will be accretive to sales and Adjusted EBITDA within the first year. DMC intends to acquire the remaining 40% interest in Arcadia through a put and call option exercisable beginning in December 2024.

The acquisition was made possible by our debt-free balance sheet and responsible capital raising leading up to the execution and closing of the transaction. In 2021, we raised net proceeds of approximately $25.3 million through our at-the-market (ATM) equity program at a weighted average price per share of $64.47. During the second quarter of 2021 we raised an additional approximately $123.5 million in net proceeds through a registered public offering at a market price of $45.00 per share. The proceeds of these offerings were used in part to fund the acquisition of Arcadia. The remaining purchase price was funded with proceeds from an amended and restated credit facility.

Immediately prior to the acquisition of Arcadia, DMC’s net cash (defined as total cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities minus debt) was $170.6 million, as compared to net cash of $42.6  million at December 31, 2020. DMC was debt-free immediately prior to the acquisition. DMC’s debt-to-Adjusted EBITDA leverage ratio after the Arcadia acquisition at December 31, 2021 was 3.0, while its net-debt-to Adjusted EBITDA at the end of the year was 2.3.

2021 Compensation Decisions at A Glance

The following pay decisions were made in 2021:

	COMPENSATION ELEMENT		2021 DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
	•   The Compensation Committee maintained salaries at 2020 levels, except for one executive receiving a 4.8% increase due to increase in responsibilities		•   Generally, maintain salaries at 2020 levels due to continuing impacts of COVID and other impacts on the oil and gas industry •   Changes to base salary consider level of responsibility and complexity of position, peer compensation levels, individual performance, market alignment and other factors
	•   No change in target award opportunities		•   Target awards set as a percentage of salary for each NEO •   Weightings and metrics: •  70% — Company Performance •  30% — Individual Performance •   No payout on a metric if performance is below threshold; award capped at 180% of target
	•   Compensation Committee maintained grants at levels approximating 2020 levels		•   Consists of time-based restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs) (one-half of target LTI value) and performance-based stock units (PSUs) (one-half of target LTI value) •   Time-based restricted stock or RSUs vest over 3-year period based on continued service •   PSUs vest at end of 3-year period based on metrics set at time of grant •   Actual awards can range from 0% to 200% of target award •   Metrics: •  Relative TSR •  Adjusted EBITDA

Good Compensation Governance Practices

The Compensation Committee continually evaluates the Company’s compensation policies and practices to ensure that they are consistent with good governance principles. Below are highlights of our governance practices:

WHAT WE DO			WHAT WE DON’T DO
	Provide the majority of compensation in performance-based pay			No “single-trigger” change of control severance benefits
	Maintain robust stock ownership requirements			No hedging transactions or pledging of our common stock by executive officers
	Maintain a clawback policy			No evergreen provision in the equity incentive plan
	Use an independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee			No liberal share recycling
	Conduct annual compensation program risk assessment			No liberal definition of change of control
	Limit perquisites			No defined benefit plans for executive officers

2021 Say On Pay Results & Shareholder Engagement

The Board of Directors gives significant weight to the advisory vote on executive compensation (say on pay) vote, as well as feedback from our stockholders, and responds accordingly. At the 2021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, approximately 99.6% of stockholders supported our executive compensation program. Following the vote and throughout 2021, the Board and senior management team continued their regular cadence of communications with stockholders, engaging in over 100 in person and virtual meetings with investors during 2021, and no significant compensation matters were raised as a concern by investors. However, the Compensation Committee recognizes the ever-evolving compensation and governance landscape and will continue to review its practices and solicit stakeholder feedback on these issues.

What Guides Our Program

Our compensation philosophy and objectives are to: (i) provide a compensation program that attracts, motivates, and retains high-caliber leadership talent; (ii) offer compensation opportunities that are competitive with those provided by other comparable U.S. public companies as determined by our market research; (iii) create incentive compensation opportunities that emphasize the importance of achieving both short-term performance measures (i.e., annual) and long-term financial and strategic goals; and (iv) sponsor performance pay programs that are linked to stockholder value.

Elements of Executive Compensation

Our executive compensation program is composed of base salary and short-term and long-term incentives, each of which is described below.

		Compensation Component		Purpose
FIXED		Base salary			Provide a competitive fixed rate of pay relative to similar positions in the market
		Paid in cash			Enable the Company to attract and retain critical executive talent
AT RISK		Short-term incentives Paid in cash under the annual incentive plan			Focus NEOs on achieving rigorous and progressively challenging short-term performance goals that align with the Company’s annual operating plan and result in long-term value creation
		Long-term incentives Paid under the equity incentive plan using a mix of equity vehicles			Focus NEOs on longer-term relative and absolute performance goals that strongly align with and drive stockholder value creation, as well as support the Company’s leadership retention strategy

COMPENSATION MIX

The charts below show the total target compensation of our CEO and our other NEOs. These charts illustrate that a majority of NEO total target compensation is variable (82% for our CEO and an average of 61% for our other NEOs).

The Decision Making Process

THE ROLE OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and senior management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, www.dmcglobal.com, by clicking “Investors,” and then “Governance.”

THE ROLE OF SENIOR MANAGEMENT

Our CEO confers with the Chairman of the Committee in recommending for the Committee’s approval of the salaries of, annual incentives and long-term incentives of the NEOs other than himself. Our CEO also provides an assessment of the other NEOs’ performance with respect to achieving the performance objectives for the qualitative portion of the performance bonus under the annual incentive plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee ultimately determines compensation levels and amounts for all NEOs. The Committee determines CEO pay and performance, and holds these discussions in executive session without the CEO present.

THE ROLE OF THE INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT

The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to assist the Committee in making compensation decisions for the NEOs. The Committee retained Pearl Meyer & Partners, LLC (Pearl Meyer) for 2021.

The compensation consultant reviews the Company’s overall executive officer and director compensation in comparison to other comparably-sized public companies in industries similar to the Company’s, helps the Committee identify the appropriate mix of compensation components for compensating our executive officers, and facilitates the Committee’s determination of our executive officers’ incentive based compensation. The Committee’s consultant also keeps the Committee current with pay practices and governance trends, attends meetings when necessary to review reports and analyses and conducts special studies as may be required by the Committee from time to time.

Pearl Meyer does not provide any other services to the Company or our management or have any other direct or indirect business relationships with us or our management other than to advise on board of director pay and practices. The Committee has assessed the independence of Pearl Meyer and concluded that its work does not raise any conflicts of interest.

THE ROLE OF MARKET REFERENCES AND THE PEER GROUP

The Company competes with business entities across multiple industries for top executive-level talent. To this end, the Committee evaluates, on an annual basis, industry-specific and general market compensation practices and trends to ensure that our program and NEO pay opportunities remain appropriately competitive. The Committee believes peer group and general industry data provide a broader pay perspective than peer group data alone.

The Committee also evaluates the appropriateness of each NEO’s compensation taking into account Company and business unit performance, job scope, individual performance, time in position, and other relevant factors. To the extent the Committee deems the compensation level associated with a NEO’s position versus the market is not aligned with the relevant factors, the Committee may choose to modify one or more of the NEO’s compensation components. The Committee does not target a specific level of pay.

The peer group listed below was used for purposes of setting executive compensation levels for 2021, as well as benchmarking relative performance for awards granted under the equity incentive plan.

PEER GROUP DATA ($M) – KEY MEASURES

2021 Executive Compensation Program In Detail

Base Salary

Base salary is evaluated each year after reviewing each NEO’s performance, peer group compensation data, and survey market data. The Committee reviews salaries annually and adjusts them if needed to reflect performance and ensure they remain competitive.

The Compensation Committee adjusted Ms. Shepston’s salary for competitive reasons and due to increased responsibilities and believed all other salaries were competitive with market levels.

Annual Incentives

The annual incentive plan provides our NEOs the opportunity to earn a performance-based annual cash bonus. Actual bonus awards depend on the achievement of company performance objectives and a qualitative assessment of individual performance and can range from 0% to 180% of target award. Target annual bonus opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary and were established by the NEO’s level of responsibility and his or her ability to impact overall results and market practices for each position.

Target award opportunities as a percentage of base salary for each NEO are as follows:

The annual incentive plan for the NEOs consists of a quantitative company performance component and a qualitative individual component. For all the NEOs, the company performance component at target is 70% of the total bonus, and the qualitative individual component is 30%.

COMPANY PERFORMANCE COMPONENT

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance measures under the annual incentive plan annually to ensure they support our operating plan and keep our NEOs focused on attaining progressively challenging short-term goals. For 2021, the Company performance component was based on DMC Global or business unit performance against pre-determined Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of revenue goals. For actual performance that falls between data points, linear interpolation is used to calculate the payout. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that we believe provides an important indicator of our ongoing performance, is aligned with our operating plan and is used regularly in financial decisions.

The Company performance component of the award is determined based on actual performance achieved, as well as each NEO’s respective area(s) of responsibility — in either DMC Global or their respective business unit. For the Company performance component of the award that may be awarded to Messrs. Grieves and Nobili, the Committee may also apply a bonus multiplier of +/- 10% (but may not increase the payment beyond the 180% bonus maximum). The multiplier is based on the number of days by which NobelClad or DynaEnergetics increases or decreases its average working capital cash collection cycle during 2021.

DMC Global Inc.

NEOs:

Mr. Longe, Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Kuta, Chief Financial Officer

Ms. Shepston, Chief Legal Officer

In February 2021, the Board adopted 2021 Company performance measures set forth in relevant part below, with target payout to occur at $270 million in revenue and $34.9 million in Adjusted EBITDA.

Actual results: The Company’s 2021 Adjusted EBITDA percentage of 7.8% and revenue of $260.1 million resulted in a 58% payout for the Company performance component portion of the annual award.

DynaEnergetics

NEOs:

Mr. Grieves, President and Managing Director

In February 2021, the Board adopted 2021 DynaEnergetics performance measures set forth in relevant part below, with target payout to occur at $170 million in revenue and $28.9 million in Adjusted EBITDA.

Actual results: DynaEnergetics’ Adjusted EBITDA percentage of 9.4% and revenue of $175.4 million resulted in a 0% payout for the Company performance component portion of the annual award. The bonus multiplier had no impact on the payout for 2021.

NobelClad

NEOs:

Mr. Nobili, President

In February 2021, the Board adopted 2021 NobelClad performance measures set forth in relevant part below, with target payout to occur at $100 million in revenue and $14.0 million in Adjusted EBITDA.

Actual results: NobelClad’s Adjusted EBITDA percentage of 16.2% and revenue of $84.8 million resulted in an 85% payout for the Company performance component portion of the annual award. The bonus multiplier had no impact on the payout for 2021.

Individual Performance Component

With respect to 2021, the Compensation Committee considered the contribution of each NEO to Company performance, including navigating the continuing COVID pandemic and related challenging market conditions, while maintaining focus on safety, operational excellence and product innovation, and other individual achievements.

Based on these accomplishments, the Committee determined that the percentage multiple for Messrs. Longe, Kuta, Grieves, and Nobili and Ms. Shepston were 100%.

OVERALL RESULTS

The total annual bonus awards for 2021 for each NEO were calculated as follows:

Long-Term Equity Incentives

The Committee believes that long-term equity incentive grants are important in aligning executives with the long-term performance of the Company. For 2021, the Committee set target long-term incentive grants for each NEO. Awards were granted using a mix of restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance share units (PSUs).

Restricted Stock/RSUs. Restricted stock vests over a three-year period with one-third of such shares vesting on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date. RSUs are granted to non-US NEOs and vest over a three-year period. RSU’s granted to Mr. Grieves vest on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of grant; RSU’s granted to Mr. Nobili vest two-thirds on the second anniversary of the grant date and one-third vests on the third anniversary of the grant date due to French tax considerations. Each RSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s stock upon vesting.

PSUs. PSUs are performance-based equity awards that provide for payouts that can range from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs granted based on achievement of financial performance goals and relative TSR results over a three-year period (Performance Period). Each earned PSU represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock.

The PSUs earned, if any, will cliff vest on the third anniversary of grant based on the degree of satisfaction of the PSU performance conditions. The actual number of PSUs earned and vested over the Performance Period is dependent on the achievement of a pre-determined Adjusted EBITDA goal (25%) and TSR performance relative to the peer group (75%).

The table below shows the equity awards granted under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) on February 23, 2021 for each of the NEOs:

The Compensation Committee established target LTI awards for each NEO. The number of shares or units is calculated based on the LTI targets and the closing price of the Company’s stock on the day prior to grant date.

TRANSACTION BONUS

In light of the significant efforts expended in financing, negotiating and closing the Arcadia acquisition and the continuing effort and expertise that will be required to successfully integrate Arcadia with DMC, the Committee determined to make certain grants of common stock, with one-third of the grant vesting upon issuance to recognize the successfully closing of the acquisition, and the remainder vesting in full on the second anniversary of the date of grant to incentivize the executives to successfully integrate Arcadia with DMC. The Committee recommended, and the Board approved, a one-time grant of stock effective as of March 2, 2022, pursuant to the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Plan as follows:

VESTING OF PRIOR AWARDS

PSU’s granted on February 27, 2018 vested on February 27, 2021 at 200% of target award amounts based on the following:

Other Executive Compensation Practices and Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We maintain rigorous stock ownership guidelines. After a five-year phase-in period, our CEO is expected to hold common stock with a value that is at least five times his base salary. After a three-year phase-in period, each of our other NEOs is expected to hold common stock equal to the aggregate number of shares awarded to such officer over the preceding three-year period, less the amount of stock equal in value to the taxes paid on such stock award. In addition, within five years of election to the Board, our non-employee directors are expected to hold stock worth at least five times the amount of the annual cash Board retainer fee. For purposes of the calculations for the CEO and non-employee directors, all shares held, whether vested, unvested or deferred, are considered owned by the executive or director. The value of shares held is calculated at the higher of (i) the average closing price of a share of the Company’s stock for the year ending December 31 and (ii) the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of vesting or acquisition. All of our NEOs and directors are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines or fall within the relevant exception period.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

Our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from using any strategies or products (such as derivative securities or short-selling techniques) to hedge against potential changes in the value of DMC common stock. In addition, our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from holding DMC securities in a margin account or pledging DMC securities as collateral for a loan.

Clawback Policy

Our clawback policy allows the Board to recoup certain executive compensation in the event of an accounting restatement resulting from material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the federal securities laws. The policy covers all the Company’s current and future NEOs and applies to incentive compensation paid by the Company (annual bonuses and other short-term and long-term incentives, restricted stock and other equity awards).

Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Compensation Policies and Practices

Our Compensation Committee, with the assistance of management, reviews on an annual basis our compensation programs and considers whether they encourage excessive risk-taking by employees at the expense of long-term Company value. The Committee believes that the design of our executive compensation program, which includes a mix of annual and long-term incentives (a substantial portion of which are performance based) and cash and equity awards, along with our stock ownership guidelines and clawback policy, provide an appropriate balance between risk and reward and do not motivate imprudent risk-taking. As a result, we do not believe that our compensation policies are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Tax Considerations

We consider the impact of various tax and accounting rules in implementing our compensation program. We have historically structured incentive compensation arrangements with a view toward qualifying them as performance-based compensation exempt from the deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, although we have viewed and continue to view the availability of a tax deduction as only one relevant consideration. The Committee believes that its primary responsibility is to provide a compensation program that is consistent with its compensation philosophy and supports the achievement of its compensation objectives.

Federal tax legislation enacted in December 2017 eliminated the Section 162(m) performance-based compensation exemption prospectively and made other changes to Section 162(m), but with a transition rule that preserves the performance-based compensation exemption for certain arrangements and awards in place as of November 2, 2017. We intend to continue to administer arrangements and awards subject to this transition rule with a view toward preserving their eligibility for the performance-based compensation exemption to the extent practicable and consistent with the non-tax compensation program objectives noted above.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with management. Based on such review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement.

Compensation Committee

Robert A. Cohen (Chair)
David C. Aldous
Michael A. Kelly
Clifton Peter Rose

During 2021, the Company had an employment agreement with Mr. Longe and agreements to compensate Messrs. Kuta, Grieves and Nobili and Ms. Shepston.

KEVIN T. LONGE

On June 26, 2012, Mr. Longe was appointed as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer and Executive Vice President. At the time of his hiring as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, the Company and Mr. Longe agreed upon the terms and form of an employment agreement the parties would execute if the Board made Mr. Longe the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. This employment agreement was executed and became effective when Mr. Longe assumed the position of President and Chief Executive Officer on March 1, 2013.

Mr. Longe’s employment agreement provides for an annual base salary, which will be reviewed annually and may be increased (but not decreased) at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. This agreement provides that Mr. Longe is eligible (but not guaranteed) to receive a discretionary annual bonus of up to 100% of his base salary, based upon achievement of performance goals established by the Compensation Committee. Mr. Longe will be eligible to receive other incentive awards, which will vest immediately if Mr. Longe’s employment is terminated other than for cause.

Under the employment agreement, Mr. Longe also receives the following benefits: (i) term life insurance coverage in the amount of $750,000, which is in addition to the standard term life insurance provided in the Company’s standard benefit plan; (ii) participation in the executive long-term disability plan; (iii) four weeks of vacation per year; (iv) participation in the Company’s standard benefit programs including health and dental insurance, term life insurance, accidental death and dismemberment insurance, short and long term disability, paid holiday, and certain other standard benefits provided by the Company; (v) participation in the Company’s 401(k) retirement plan; and (vi) reimbursement of up to $5,000 of professional service fees annually for a financial planning and/or tax consulting.

The employment agreement may be terminated at any time by the Company for cause (as defined below) effective immediately upon written notice to Mr. Longe. The employment agreement also provides that Mr. Longe’s employment can be terminated by the Company for any reason other than for cause upon the payment of an amount equal to 18 months of salary, payable in equal monthly payments, plus a bonus for such period equal to 150% of the average bonus (if any) paid to Mr. Longe for the three years preceding his termination (or, if shorter, the number of years of his employment with the Company), provided that Mr. Longe releases the Company from all claims as a condition of receiving the payments. Such amounts will be reduced to the extent that Mr. Longe accepts other employment prior to the final payment. Mr. Longe may terminate his employment with the Company at any time upon sixty days written notice (or upon such shorter period as the Company may agree in writing).

For purposes of Mr. Longe’s employment agreement, “cause” is defined as: (i) a willful and substantial breach by Mr. Longe of the terms of the employment agreement that has a materially adverse effect on the business and affairs of the Company; (ii) the failure by Mr. Longe to substantially perform, or the gross negligence in the performance of, his duties under the agreement for a period of fifteen days after the Board has made a written demand for performance which specifically identifies the manner in which it believes that Mr. Longe has not substantially performed his duties; (iii) the commission by Mr. Longe of a willful act or failure to act of misconduct which is injurious to the Company, including, but not limited to, material violations of any Company policy (such as the Company’s Code of Ethics); (iv) conviction or a plea of guilty or nolo contendere in connection with fraud or any crime that constitutes a felony in the jurisdiction involved; or (v) an act or failure to act constituting fraud or dishonesty that compromises Mr. Longe’s ability to act effectively as a high-level executive of the Company.

Mr. Longe’s agreement provides that if a Change in Control Event (as defined below) occurs and is followed within one year by a Material Change (as defined below) and the Material Change is not corrected following notice, Mr. Longe may terminate his employment, if not already terminated by the Company. If that occurs, Mr. Longe will be paid an amount equal to two years of salary and 200% of the average annual bonus earned over the preceding three years. In addition, all of Mr. Longe’s restricted stock or other equity awards will immediately vest.

Generally, a “Change in Control Event” means (i) a person or group acquires 25% of more of the Company’s stock; (ii) over a 24-month period the members of the Board at that time, or their appointees, fail to constitute a majority of the Board; (iii) the Company sells substantially all of its assets or merges into another corporation and its stockholders do not control the merged corporation; or (iv) the Company’s stockholders approve the liquidation or dissolution of the Company. Generally, a “Material Change” means (i) a material change in Mr. Longe’s functions, duties or responsibilities from those before the Change in Control Event; (ii) the Company assigns or reassigns him to another place of employment at least fifty miles from Boulder, Colorado; (iii) his salary and other compensation are reduced; or (iv) a purchaser of all or substantially all of the company’s assets fails to assume Mr. Longe’s employment agreement.

The employment agreement also contains customary non-competition and non-solicitation covenants. These covenants will be effective during Mr. Longe’s employment and for a period of two years following termination of his employment for any reason.

MICHAEL KUTA

Our offer letter with Mr. Kuta dated February 23, 2014, provided a base salary, with participation in the annual incentive plan at a target level of 60% of base salary. Mr. Kuta is also eligible to participate in various Company benefit programs. We agreed to pay Mr. Kuta a one-time severance payment equal to 18 months of his then-current base salary if his employment was terminated as a result of a change of control of the Company. The definition of change of control is generally similar to the definition of Change of Control Event in Mr. Longe’s employment agreement.

MICHELLE SHEPSTON

Our offer letter with Ms. Shepston dated July 17, 2016 provided a base salary, with participation in the annual incentive plan at a target level of 40% of base salary. Ms. Shepston is also eligible to participate in various Company benefit programs. We agreed to pay Ms. Shepston a one-time severance payment equal to 12 months of her then-current base salary if her employment is terminated as a result of a change of control of the Company (defined substantially in accordance with Change of Control Event in Mr. Longe’s employment agreement), and agreed to pay a one-time severance payment equal to six months of her then-current base salary if her employment is terminated without cause other than in connection with a change of control.

IAN GRIEVES

DynaEnergetics Holding GmbH initially entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Grieves dated July 26, 2013, which was later replaced by an employment agreement entered into by and between DynaEnergetics Europe GmbH and Mr. Grieves dated January 1, 2020. Mr. Grieves’ employment agreement provides for an annual base salary, with participation in the annual incentive plan at a target level of 60% of base salary. Mr. Grieves is also eligible to participate in various Company benefit programs. The employment agreement also contains non-competition and non-solicitation covenants, to be effective during Mr. Grieves’ employment and for a period of two years following termination of his employment. For the duration of Mr. Grieves’ non-competition obligation following termination, he will receive compensation in an amount equal to one half of his fixed yearly annual salary.

ANTOINE NOBILI

NobelClad Europe SAS entered into an addendum to Mr. Nobili’s work contract dated July 24, 2020, which provides for an annual base salary, with participation in the annual incentive plan at a target level of 40% of base salary. Mr. Nobili also participates in NobelClad Europe SAS’s profit sharing plan, and he is eligible to participate in various other Company benefit programs.

NEOs are eligible to defer a portion of their annual salary, their annual incentive bonus, and their equity awards through the DMC Global Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan on a tax-deferred basis. Deferrals into the plan are not matched or subsidized by the Company, nor are they eligible for above-market or preferential earnings.

The following table shows information about the amount of contributions, earnings, and balances for each named executive officer under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan as of December 31, 2021.

The table below sets forth the potential payments to our named executive officers under various termination scenarios including termination without cause, termination as a result of death or disability and termination as a result of retirement, under the terms of their respective employment or other agreements and the equity incentive plans. See “Employment Agreements” above for a summary of the terms of applicable employment agreements or arrangements with our named executive officers. Under the award agreements governing equity grants under our equity incentive plans, if the named executive officer’s employment is terminated for any reason other than (i) death, (ii) disability, or (iii) termination without cause (as defined in the executive’s employment agreement), the named executive officer shall, for no consideration, forfeit to us any shares of restricted stock to the extent such shares are not vested at the time of such termination of employment. If the named executive officer’s employment terminates due to death or disability, or is terminated without cause, any unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units will immediately vest on the date of the executive’s termination of employment for such reason.

For purposes of this table, we have assumed the date of termination of employment (regardless of the circumstances) is December 31, 2021, and that termination occurred under the terms of any current employment or change in control agreement. The price of our common stock on December 31, 2021 was $39.61. We have not included the financial effect of a termination for cause as the named executive officers are not entitled to any further compensation or benefits following such a termination. Furthermore, the amounts shown in the tables below do not include payments to the extent they are provided on a non-discriminatory basis to salaried employees generally upon termination of employment, including accrued salary and vacation pay. Payment of salary continuation upon termination will be made in monthly payments while any salary owed upon termination will be paid in a single lump sum. Payment of these amounts after termination without cause is generally conditioned upon the former executive’s execution of a release and waivers and continued compliance with non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality obligations. We may make changes to the current employment and termination arrangements with our executive officers or enter into new arrangements from time to time.

COMPENSATION FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Our director compensation program is designed to include annual retainer fees paid in a combination of cash and restricted stock and additional cash retainer amounts paid for Board and committee leadership positions. In 2021, each of our non-employee directors received an annual cash retainer of $65,000. Each non-employee director was also granted on the date of the Company’s 2021 annual stockholder meeting a restricted stock award with a value equivalent to $110,000 (based on the closing price of DMC’s stock on the trading day prior to the annual stockholder meeting), with such awards to vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. Directors received additional annual cash retainers as follows: $40,000 to the Chairman of the Board; $20,000 to the Audit Committee chairman; $12,000 to the Compensation Committee chairman; and $9,000 to the chairman of each of the other Board committees.

The annual cash retainers are paid quarterly. If two meetings are missed by a director, the retainer will be reduced by 25% and reduced further on a pro rata basis for each additional meeting missed. The members of the Board are also eligible for reimbursement of their expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board meetings. New directors typically receive a restricted stock award with a value equivalent to $60,000 as of their date of appointment to the Board, with such award to vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant date.

Directors are eligible to defer any or all of their annual cash retainers and equity awards through the DMC Global Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan on a tax-deferred basis. During 2021, Mr. Graff and Ms. Bertone elected to defer all of their annual equity awards. Deferrals into the plan are not matched or subsidized by the Company, nor are they eligible for above-market or preferential earnings.

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

Under our stock ownership guidelines, within five years of election to the Board, our non-employee directors are expected to hold stock worth at least five times the amount of the annual cash Board retainer fee. All of our non-employee directors are in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines or fall within the exception period.

Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are required to disclose the annual total compensation of the individual identified as our median paid employee, the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Longe, and the ratio of these two amounts. In 2021, the annual total compensation for the median identified employee was $67,839; the annual total compensation for our CEO was $3,844,266; and the resulting ratio between the two was approximately 1 to 57.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

In determining the employee population to be used to identify the median employee, we included all of our full-time, part-time, and temporary employees globally (excluding our CEO) who were employed as of December 31, 2021, consisting of 1,660 employees, of which 1,460 were U.S. employees and 254 were non-U.S. employees. We excluded from this employee population 945 employees of Arcadia pursuant to the exception for acquisitions that close during the fiscal year that is provided in the applicable SEC rule. In addition, we excluded seven employees (three employees in Korea, two employees in China, one employee in Singapore and one employee in Ireland) who represented less than 5% of our total employees, pursuant to the “de minimis” exception provided in the applicable SEC rule. As a result, the employee population that we used for purposes of determining the compensation of our median employee consisted of 708 employees, of which 461 were U.S. employees and 247 were non-U.S. employees.

We used a consistently applied compensation measure to identify our median employee, which consisted of total cash compensation (including wages and cash bonuses) paid to each employee (other than the CEO) during 2021.

Earnings of our employees outside the U.S. were converted to U.S. dollars using the same yearly average exchange rate used in preparing our December 31, 2021 consolidated financial statements.

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2021 with respect to the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 17, 2022 by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our executive officers; and (iii) all of our directors and executive officers as a group.